Close Reading

I often make the simple response to the obsession with race and color, skin color is an illusion as well as even nationality and race .people who have scientific mind created all these names as well as for animals. Then I will be free to call my Of the human race,forget treating others as white,yellow,black,red,brown etc. Then I will invent my own scientific naming to a new name for all pet mammals A cuchy or mammalius d la plupus d cuchus or. fuzzy hairy small pet mammal. We humans often abuse this science power calling other human people derogatory racial names just to add insult to injury at each other. I would not be surprised that aliens from other worlds are studying the hate humans are inflicting on each other and if the United Nations fails to hold a race war, look up to the skies and behold it ain't Jesus, the flying space discs will battle planet decided earth! The human race hasn't met the expected perfected plane of spiritual and intellectual awareness to Stewart our planet mother earth. But the question I ask, If the space disks win,and the extraterrestrials rule, what will life be like under alien rule, education,economic policy, work, labor , industry, food , commerce, social life etc? will it be better or worse.Does racism among humans have to lead us to such a possibility to be invaded by another unknown race from space. Rather we must see the good,constructive, creative,beneficial and artistic musical in all races. The the light skinned races tend to be planners builders,architects and social engineers,they can teach others the skills for a better world lukecthe darker races can teach other races how to tune in to nature,medium pace if life,balance spirituality, balanced emotions and as they integrate planning psychology and scientific engineering to their creative capacity to help Asians, The Indian and the those of other races in the Pacific to help renew,create a more better balanced educated world. Louisville KY

Good to know that not all are getting in. But I would rather this guy than any Muslim.

This is a sad story, hoping it ends well. I live in Canada and if I would be working for immigration, I would all bring them to my home. This is such a good family, with a dedicated hard working father.

would be a good idea for brits and americans not comming into other countries and teach people how to live. They will not teach you back

If the Bible was divinely inspired, then why would it have so many really obvious contradictions?\nTheological doctrines:\n1. God is satisfied with his works\nGen 1:31\nGod is dissatisfied with his works.\nGen 6:6\n2. God dwells in chosen temples\n2 Chron 7:12,16\nGod dwells not in temples\nActs 7:48\n3. God dwells in light\nTim 6:16\nGod dwells in darkness\n1 Kings 8:12/ Ps 18:11/ Ps 97:2\n4. God is seen and heard\nEx 33:23/ Ex 33:11/ Gen 3:9,10/ Gen 32:30/ Is 6:1/\nEx 24:9-11\nGod is invisible and cannot be heard\nJohn 1:18/ John 5:37/ Ex 33:20/ 1 Tim 6:16\n5. God is tired and rests\nEx 31:17\nGod is never tired and never rests\nIs 40:28\n6. God is everywhere present, sees and knows all things\nProv 15:3/ Ps 139:7-10/ Job 34:22,21\nGod is not everywhere present, neither sees nor knows all\nthings\nGen 11:5/ Gen 18:20,21/ Gen 3:8\n7. God knows the hearts of men\nActs 1:24/ Ps 139:2,3\nGod tries men to find out what is in their heart\nDeut 13:3/ Deut 8:2/ Gen 22:12\n8. God is all powerful\nJer 32:27/ Matt 19:26\nGod is not all powerful\nJudg 1:19\n9. God is unchangeable\nJames 1:17/ Mal 3:6/ Ezek 24:14/ Num 23:19\nGod is changeable\nGen 6:6/ Jonah 3:10/ 1 Sam 2:30,31/ 2 Kings 20:1,4,5,6/\nEx 33:1,3,17,14\n10. God is just and impartial\nPs 92:15/ Gen 18:25/ Deut 32:4/ Rom 2:11/ Ezek 18:25\nGod is unjust and partial\nGen 9:25/ Ex 20:5/ Rom 9:11-13/ Matt 13:12\n11. God is the author of evil\nLam 3:38/ Jer 18:11/ Is 45:7/ Amos 3:6/ Ezek 20:25\nGod is not the author of evil\n1 Cor 14:33/ Deut 32:4/ James 1:13\n12. God gives freely to those who ask\nJames 1:5/ Luke 11:10\nGod withholds his blessings and prevents men from receiving\nthem\nJohn 12:40/ Josh 11:20/ Is 63:17\n13. God is to be found by those who seek him\nMatt 7:8/ Prov 8:17\nGod is not to be found by those who seek him\nProv 1:28\n14. God is warlike\nEx 15:3/ Is 51:15\nGod is peaceful\nRom 15:33/ 1 Cor 14:33\n15. God is cruel, unmerciful, destructive, and ferocious\nJer 13:14/ Deut 7:16/ 1 Sam 15:2,3/ 1 Sam 6:19\nGod is kind, merciful, and good\nJames 5:11/ Lam 3:33/ 1 Chron 16:34/ Ezek 18:32/ Ps 145:9/\n1 Tim 2:4/ 1 John 4:16/ Ps 25:8\n16. God's anger is fierce and endures long\nNum 32:13/ Num 25:4/ Jer 17:4\nGod's anger is slow and endures but for a minute\nPs 103:8/ Ps 30:5\n17. God commands, approves of, and delights in burnt offerings,\nsacrifices ,and holy days\nEx 29:36/ Lev 23:27/ Ex 29:18/ Lev 1:9\nGod disapproves of and has no pleasure in burnt offerings,\nsacrifices, and holy days.\nJer 7:22/ Jer 6:20/ Ps 50:13,4/ Is 1:13,11,12\n18. God accepts human sacrifices\n2 Sam 21:8,9,14/ Gen 22:2/ Judg 11:30-32,34,38,39\nGod forbids human sacrifice\nDeut 12:30,31\n19. God tempts men\nGen 22:1/ 2 Sam 24:1/ Jer 20:7/ Matt 6:13\nGod tempts no man\nJames 1:13\n20. God cannot lie\nHeb 6:18\nGod lies by proxy; he sends forth lying spirits t deceive\n2 Thes 2:11/ 1 Kings 22:23/ Ezek 14:9\n21. Because of man's wickedness God destroys him\nGen 6:5,7\nBecause of man's wickedness God will not destroy him\nGen 8:21\n22. God's attributes are revealed in his works.\nRom 1:20\nGod's attributes cannot be discovered\nJob 11:7/ Is 40:28\n23. There is but one God\nDeut 6:4\nThere is a plurality of gods\nGen 1:26/ Gen 3:22/ Gen 18:1-3/ 1 John 5:7\nMoral Precepts\n24. Robbery commanded\nEx 3:21,22/ Ex 12:35,36\nRobbery forbidden\nLev 19:13/ Ex 20:15\n25. Lying approved and sanctioned\nJosh 2:4-6/ James 2:25/ Ex 1:18-20/ 1 Kings 22:21,22\nLying forbidden\nEx 20:16/ Prov 12:22/ Rev 21:8\n26. Hatred to the Edomite sanctioned\n2 Kings 14:7,3\nHatred to the Edomite forbidden\nDeut 23:7\n27. Killing commanded\nEx 32:27\nKilling forbidden\nEx 20:13\n28. The blood-shedder must die\nGen 9:5,6\nThe blood-shedder must not die\nGen 4:15\n29. The making of images forbidden\nEx 20:4\nThe making of images commanded\nEx 25:18,20\n30. Slavery and oppression ordained\nGen 9:25/ Lev 25:45,46/ Joel 3:8\nSlavery and oppression forbidden\nIs 58:6/ Ex 22:21/ Ex 21:16/ Matt 23:10\n31. Improvidence enjoyed\nMatt 6:28,31,34/ Luke 6:30,35/ Luke 12:3\nImprovidence condemned\n1 Tim 5:8/ Prov 13:22\n32. Anger approved\nEph 4:26\nAnger disapproved\nEccl 7:9/ Prov 22:24/ James 1:20\n33. Good works to be seen of men\nMatt 5:16\nGood works not to be seen of men\nMatt 6:1\n34. Judging of others forbidden\nMatt 7:1,2\nJudging of others approved\n1 Cor 6:2-4/ 1 Cor 5:12\n35. Christ taught non-resistance\nMatt 5:39/ Matt 26:52\nChrist taught and practiced physical resistance\nLuke 22:36/ John 2:15\n36. Christ warned his followers not to fear being killed\nLuke 12:4\nChrist himself avoided the Jews for fear of being killed\nJohn 7:1\n37. Public prayer sanctioned\n1 Kings 8:22,54, 9:3\nPublic prayer disapproved\nMatt 6:5,6\n38. Importunity in prayer commended\nLuke 18:5,7\nImportunity in prayer condemned\nMatt 6:7,8\n39. The wearing of long hair by men sanctioned\nJudg 13:5/ Num 6:5\nThe wearing of long hair by men condemned\n1 Cor 11:14\n40. Circumcision instituted\nGen 17:10\nCircumcision condemned\nGal 5:2\n41. The Sabbath instituted\nEx 20:8\nThe Sabbath repudiated\nIs 1:13/ Rom 14:5/ Col 2:16\n42. The Sabbath instituted because God rested on the seventh day\nEx 20:11\nThe Sabbath instituted because God brought the Israelites\nout of Egypt\nDeut 5:15\n43. No work to be done on the Sabbath under penalty of death\nEx 31:15/ Num 15:32,36\nJesus Christ broke the Sabbath and justified his disciples in\nthe same\nJohn 5:16/ Matt 12:1-3,5\n44. Baptism commanded\nMatt 28:19\nBaptism not commanded\n1 Cor 1:17,14\n45. Every kind of animal allowed for food.\nGen 9:3/ 1 Cor 10:25/ Rom 14:14\nCertain kinds of animals prohibited for food.\nDeut 14:7,8\n46. Taking of oaths sanctioned\nNum 30:2/ Gen 21:23-24,31/ Gen 31:53/ Heb 6:13\nTaking of oaths forbidden\nMatt 5:34\n47. Marriage approved\nGen 2:18/ Gen 1:28/ Matt 19:5/ Heb 13:4\nMarriage disapproved\n1 Cor 7:1/ 1 Cor 7:7,8\n48. Freedom of divorce permitted\nDeut 24:1/ Deut 21:10,11,14\nDivorce restricted\nMatt 5:32\n49. Adultery forbidden\nEx 20:14/ Heb 13:4\nAdultery allowed\nNum 31:18/ Hos 1:2; 2:1-3\n50. Marriage or cohabitation with a sister denounced\nDeut 27:22/ Lev 20:17\nAbraham married his sister and God blessed the union\nGen 20:11,12/ Gen 17:16\n51. A man may marry his brother's widow\nDeut 25:5\nA man may not marry his brother's widow\nLev 20:21\n52. Hatred to kindred enjoined\nLuke 14:26\nHatred to kindred condemned\nEph 6:2/ Eph 5:25,29\n53. Intoxicating beverages recommended\nProv 31:6,7/ 1 Tim 5:23/ Ps 104:15\nIntoxicating beverages discountenanced\nProv 20:1/ Prov 23:31,32\n54. It is our duty to obey our rulers, who are God's ministers\nand punish evil doers only\nRom 13:1-3,6\nIt is not our duty to obey rulers, who sometimes punish the\ngood and receive unto themselves damnation therefor\nEx 1:17,20/ Dan 3:16,18/ Dan 6:9,7,10/ Acts 4:26,27/\nMark 12:38,39,40/ Luke 23:11,24,33,35\n55. Women's rights denied\nGen 3:16/ 1 Tim 2:12/ 1 Cor 14:34/ 1 Pet 3:6\nWomen's rights affirmed\nJudg 4:4,14,15/ ...CHRISTIANITY IS AMAN MADE RELIGION AND THE AUTHOR IS PAUL WHO DIVERTED THE TEACHING OF JESUS(PBUH) BY TEACHING TRINITY WHICH IS NOWHERE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.......ISLAM(SUBMITTING YOUR WILL TO GOD) IS THE WAY

Call me whatever, but India has been dealing with this for a very long time, probably since 1980s. I dont hate islam but I dont love it either. Let's just say that I wouldnt buy a house in Muslim neighborhood. It has been a nuisance to India since a long time, every time we screamed in UN for help. We got shut down until the problem reached world wide. People say it started happening since Iraq and syrian war which is slightly incorrect. This problem has been there since ages prior to war, It just manifested on a high level recently. There are so many examples...This religion feeling which later turns into violence starts with your own house, your upbringing and your own values. If a kid is used to seeing his mom being suppressed then when he grows up, dont expect much from him. Now every community has this issue but in Muslim community it is engraved in you the moment you open your eyes on planet earth. You cannot defend the argument when someone says Women are suppressed in mulsim culture. The most hurtful thing happening is in UK. A country which gave you food, shelter, respect, a better life. You are trying to impose your values on it? As a matter of fact, good muslims should come out openly and boycott these terrorist who are trying to create chaos if they really want to show good intentions but you wont see any (for obvious reasons). They often cry about they being a victim but what about other people?? If all good muslim come out and boycott bad muslims then that would be a thing to appreciate and notice. In last you cant clap with one hand! Remember that.

Canada is a Christian country and the muslim community must denounce Islam and be Canadain or leave. No one wants this country to look like Europe. There are good muslims and you can tell who they are. They are the ones that want to fit in to Canadas values. I would gladly protect any muslim that wishes to truely become a Canadian. Guess who I would have to protect them from? It is not Canadians they fear but muslims.

I would very much like the muslims to tell us real Canadians what contributions that they are making to our country as a whole. How are they making life in Canada better? How are they bringing stability and growth to our country? They spend time teaching their silly little book to the people in their flock but nothing about Canada, our values, our hopes and aspirations for the country. The silly little book does nothing to further the common good of Canada. It only forwards the wants of the muslim community.\nAnd finally, religion is the bane of intellectual thought. No one and I mean no one, can know about the mind of a god that does not exist.

Let us do some simple mathematics...\n\nThere are 1.6 billion muslims (supposedly) \nIt is pretty much common fact that 1% of the islamic population is considered a potential radical (that is just me being generous mind you...) Political correctness gets turned on its head and dropped here.\n\n1% of 1 600 000 000 is 16 000 000 \n\n.1% of 1 600 000 000 is 1 600 000\n\nThis is still enough man power to take over a good sized country or several at once. Consider how many men took part in operation Barbarossa and even operation Overlord during ww2. Or just look at the Battle of the Somme and Verdun. \n1 000 000 angry men vs 1 000 000 angry fanatics with little regard for their own lives can destroy an entire country or multiple countries within a period of a few months. Truely it would take a few weeks. \n\n(not the best analogy I know ... its all I've got at the moment...)\n\nHowever it is only when they are organized, armed and given some form of military training where those radicals become a serious threat.\nOr the men just have to be in decent physical condition and be capable of firing a gun whilst aiming at a target.\n\nEven 160 000 is enough to level or de-civilize a small country like Lebanon or Syria or Somalia.\n\nISIS is a mere example and yet, they have many supporters all over the planet including funding, weapons, training and other resources from the developed nations. They and other groups also have funding from the developed Arab nations and abandoned arms depots from the Soviet era. \nLets not forget how the United States didnt get rid of all of their weapons before pulling out...\n\nThey should have aborted this shit like a fat slut at the abortion clinic.

muslim women in the middle east would argue that niqab and burkas ISN'T a choice and is oppression. \npeople in the west who argue otherwise don't know true islam.\nhowever, don't hate muslims. they are the victims of terrible indoctrination. they are good people with good intentions who sadly subscribe to the cult of Islam.

I'd like to address this to the woman who went to one of Trump's rallies dressed as a Moslem with her head covered with a scarf and having a sign that reads, 'I come in peace'. I don't know why she was asked to be escorted out, but by her own words the people in the crowd were throwing questions at her as to whether she had a bomb under her cloak. Well, whether she knew it or not, she provoked the crowd by wearing the mark of a Moslem - her cloak. Also, by going to the rally dressed the way she was, she knew before hand that she'd be treated that way. On her part, I see that as provocation. Had she gone plainly dressed or attired like everybody else, there would have been no adverse reaction toward her. I don't know what she could have said why she was asked to be escorted out, but she fully knows that the whole of America had been given the real and true picture of Islam - one of terror, murder, beheading, bombs, war, and blood. How do Moslems expect the most compassionate, kind, benevolent people in the world to act? So, please, use your common sense and do not see America as the enemy, the aggressor, or the provocateurs. They're not. They are just being vigilant knowing that the enemy could be so sly, cunning and untrustworthy. Islamic people,we welcomed you to our country. Don't think that we are not watching you. We have given you a new start for a happy life compared to the life you have had in your native lands, but we are guarding against an invasion that your evil governments have designed for our beloved country. The truth of the matter is that you are our guests in our country, and you don't have he right to demand of us what you like, especially when you want us to change our laws just to accommodate or please you. The more attacks you perpetrate against Americans, the more we will be true to our resolve to deport you. Good Moslems, show your rage against the radicals amongst you. If you don't, you'll be sorry, because willy nilly, you'll be affected too. You cannot be in America and refuse to live by the laws we live by.

As a multi generational Canadian, I don't really care whether they cover their face or not. That's their choice. During my life I've seen all these different forms of conservative dress from catholic nuns, to Hutterites to Mennonites and these people are just part of the mix. What this is designed to do is to create a barrier between themselves and the larger society which is fine. I would never interact with one of these woman ever because the thin flimsy barrier makes it clear that she is not interested in talking to anyone for any reason and again this is fine. If she was with a man I would talk only with the man and completely ignore her and if she was with a male child I would talk to the male child, not to her. I don't normally chat with women who are strangers other than now and then in a supermarket line or whatever. This face thingy frees me from the need of chitchat small talk and I'm good with that. In any case we would have absolutely nothing in common.

People need to educate themselves rather than expect the media to tell the truth about Islam. If anyone is wondering about how violence became associated with Islam they need only to look at the origins and the early spread of Islam--it's success was dependent on violence and fear. If more westerners knew the truth about Islam they would reject it more vehemently. If more Muslims started thinking rationally about their belief system they would turn away from Islam. There was a good reason for the Crusades and Christian-predominate cultures shouldn't feel ashamed at this history. Perhaps we need a new Crusade.

Thank goodness I did not grow up in the muslim community during my high school days and teenage years. All those girls  I made out in car, movies, and parties never would have happened. Specially if girls are covered up and forbidden to be touch.

I don't hate muslims, but I don't understand moving to the west and having a Hijab and beard and praying 20,000 times a day, this is not what the west is about. The middle East is reserved for that kind of lifestyle, may be its good maybe its bad, but there is a time and place for everything, the West in not for that. If Westerners in the same numbers as Muslims; moved to the middle East and started to set up shop there Western style it would be inappropriate for us to do so and not the right thing, and Muslims would definitely not have any of that.

islamophobia is what radicals want. Many radical muslims are not educated and able to read the Couran by themselves that's why they turn to radical imam. If you would ever read the couran you will find radical ideology contradicts, the same as if you ever read the bible you will find catholic church history totally contradicts to the bible (more in the satan side instead).\nAnyway, regarding terror and fear, you need to ask Uncle Sam, really, the creator should provide a good explanation and history of it since 1980s.

I wonder if that muslim girl knows that we can see her face clearly through that veil? And why impose something on yourself that prevents girls and women from leaving a burning building if they aren't wearing it, leading to their deaths? Why accept this imprisonment? And how can these women think this is them being held at a higher standard? What you mean is that if you are raped, it would be considered yout fault. Just good ol'brainwashing techniques at play. \n\nIn any case, the veil does not belong in a society where people have photo IDs.

horrible? Would like some tea with those biscuits, good sir?

Have you ever considered that many of these so called good muslims support what these men are doing and are giving it a tacit approval by staying silent.I would suspect more support it then don't.

It is a very good point you make, there is an argument that if the German people had stood up to Hitler then we would not have experienced one of the largest genocides in history but Muslims are often unfairly blamed for actions that are not their own\nThe media does focus on the extremist element but the issue is that if people from a non-Muslim background try to intervene it is labelled as racism which is part of the reason that the politicians are so soft handed with Muslim extremists

you never would have been born if your great grandparents who had the good sense to keep the Muslims out had talked like that. your betraying them and all future generations\n

Its none of your business how I will fight the good fight. I strongly believe sharia law is best... and that's all that MATTERS. thats just your opinion, every society / country before was weak. With a strong economical country like britain turning islam, would be the best.\n

no its not. Muslims are a total threat to freedom. If muslims ruled then we'd be back in the stone age because they are now anti science. You wouldnt be talking here because there would be no internet. People who cant communicate are easier to control.\n And any scientist who believes in God in any form is not a good scientist since he/she obviously ignores evidence or what the lack of evidence indicates, so totally unreliable. cont..\n\n

I am against any anti social behaviour. I would not tolerate this and am fully aware of civilian powers of arrest.I have a good relationship with Muslims and more importantly the local police. We are a consensual society who respect the law by and large. This is not right. I dont want the EDL on the street either.