Research Tool
Close Reading
Click a comment to load its sentiment categories, AI rationale, and reply thread.
Comments
Page 37 of 37
· filtered
| Published | Reply likes | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-09-26 | 0 |
What a steaming pile of bs. In Saudi Arabia 4 people a week are beheaded women are only 1/4 a person as a male, and on and on I am coming to the conclusion that Islam and freedom and democracy are mutually exclusive. Canada was a free country before all this gender blending neo-Marxist culture war and we need to get back on track. And by the way when it comes to analyzing the macro socio-economic situation I am intellectually a Marxist but I'm all about freedom and democracy being the first and most important first step. These would be cultural relativists vanguard of the proletariat gender blending 3rd wavers need to go back to their offices and once again lose themselves in their navel gazing and pay heed to Plato's injunction in the Republic to leave the masses in the microcosm alone.
|
| 2015-09-21 | 0 |
The woman that are Islam are not violet. It's the men in some groups that are. I think woman should cover if they want to. Maybe they don't want to give that power to men to tell them to take it off. Like if the mans world said woman couldn't wear pants anymore, I would be defiant because someone is telling me what to do. .Woman don't want to be told want to do and if they want to cover then i'm I think they should be able to.The issue needs to be left alone and we need to have some trust!
|
| 2015-09-17 | 0 |
islamophobia is what radicals want. Many radical muslims are not educated and able to read the Couran by themselves that's why they turn to radical imam. If you would ever read the couran you will find radical ideology contradicts, the same as if you ever read the bible you will find catholic church history totally contradicts to the bible (more in the satan side instead).\nAnyway, regarding terror and fear, you need to ask Uncle Sam, really, the creator should provide a good explanation and history of it since 1980s.
|
| 2015-07-05 | 0 |
According to the Sharia law:\n\n• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.\n• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.\n• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.\n• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.\n• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.\n• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.\n• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).\n• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.\n• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.\n• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.\n• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).\n• The list goes on.\n\nI would not want to live under such law, and it is happening in Canada now. Tell me it is reasonable, and you want to obey it. But hey, if you want to be slave, it is not my business, but please keep it in your home.
|
| 2015-02-19 | 0 |
Speaking as a white man I have to admit I don't quite understand the need for anyone to organize as a race in Canada. First generation clubs from whatever country, sure, but as a race? Is it the elephant in the room... American slavery? I can't help but think that most perceived problems blacks have in Canada are due to American issues we see in movies and media.\nWe in Canada bend over backwards to offer opportunity to succeed. Even touching on racism is widely and loudly crushed. I personally, as do most, give any individual the opportunities they deserve but it's up to them to screw it up or not. To me, if any minority can't make it in this society they aren't trying.\nIt's actually worse in my mind to be white male in public forums because our views and opinions are marginalized and shouted down. Youtube and the internet are the few forums where honest feelings and opinions can be spoken. No one with anything to lose would say this in public for fear of attacks from the thought police. Pretty sad we live in a free country that actually doesn't allow free speech from all. I guess some are more free than others.\nKeep telling me I'm unfair and bad, when I'm not and I might actually grow resentment and the very prejudice you're complaining about.
|
| 2014-05-21 | 0 |
I think Britain needs an intervention. Care to guess what would happen if you tried imposing YOUR culture in the tribal lands of northern Yemen?
|
| 2014-04-04 | 0 |
And this is why we need c18 back they would fuck up Muslim patrol
|
| 2013-10-18 | 0 |
there is no need to attack people in the street and tell non-islamics to go to hell but more and more are doing it. if there were more like you in the world i'm sure things would be different
\n
|
| 2013-09-03 | 0 |
I REALLY HOPE THEY WILL NEVER INVADE IRAN! IT WOULD BE CATASTROPHIC!\nARE YOU BLAMING THE JEWS FOR THIS SPECIFIC AGENDA? MUSLIMS ALWAYS BLAME THE JEWS FOR EVERYTHING!\n\nMUSLIMS THEMSELVES ARE THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING HATED AROUND THE WORLD! THEY CANNOT BLAME SOMEONE ELSE! THEY NEED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITIES!
|
| 2013-08-03 | 0 |
No, no it wouldn't be a race war. It's about Islam not their ethnicity. There are Arab Christians who take great pride in being British and they would oppose these thugs. Actually it wouldn't be a war. It would be simply cleaning up the neighborhoods of Islamic bullies and cowards. I live very close to the main mosque in Denver and there are a lot of Muslims. Not once have I had any challenge me and I'm a 65 year old disable man. They need to know their limits in no uncertain terms.\nThomas
|
| 2013-04-30 | 0 |
No I have the right to be here, it's my planet too! I have the right to want to change the law. I find it utterly disgusting so needs to be abolished ASAP..\n\nUK would be alot better (reduced crimes and all) if run under sharia law. I am for full sharia law, and I will fight for it.
|
| 2013-03-12 | 0 |
The only reason other religions aren't stuck in the Stone Ages anymore is because they can't possibly reconcile their Stone Age beliefs so they change and reduce their mythologies. If everyone actually believed in and followed their religions truly, they would all be fundamentalists and that's part of why they need to GO.
|
Showing 1801–1812 of 1812
Prev
Next