Research Tool
Close Reading
Click a comment to load its sentiment categories, AI rationale, and reply thread.
Comments
Page 1 of 1
· filtered
| Published | Reply likes | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-04 | 0 |
Those aren't slashed numbers. Very minor adjustments....thise cuts arent big enough by far.
|
| 2026-01-04 | 0 |
How about slashing the numbers by 90%?
|
| 2026-01-04 | 0 |
Thats really slashing the numbers 😂 by a big 15000 give me a break
|
| 2026-01-03 | 0 |
Folk may think this reduction in immigration is far from any "slash" in numbers. Consider (search the web for "Is Canada's aging population an issue ?"):
"Canada's aging population is a significant issue, creating major challenges for the economy, healthcare, and social services, as more seniors require care while fewer younger workers support them, leading to potential labor shortages, strained budgets, and increased demand for healthcare and long-term support. The trend of more seniors than children under 15 puts pressure on economic growth and government finances, requiring substantial funding increases for health and care services. "
For every positive to reduced immigration numbers, Canadians are going to discover that there will be negatives. The negatives might very well justify using the word "slash". Time will tell.
|
| 2026-01-03 | 0 |
What a load of nonsense. More water carrying for the liberals. They haven’t SLASHED immigration numbers.
|
| 2026-01-03 | 0 |
“Slashed”
Shows the smallest change in numbers ever
|
| 2026-01-03 | 5 |
That's not slashing immigration numbers, that's slightly decreasing them.
|
| 2026-01-03 | 0 |
lol that's not "slashing" , all those numbers should be below 50,000
|
| 2026-01-03 | 0 |
"Slashed targets" is a snow job - don't believe the hype! These new "slashed" numbers near the start of the video are DOUBLE what they were before Justin/liberals took power a decade ago.
|
Showing 1–9 of 9
Prev
Next