Skip to content
Canadian Immigration Dashboard [ CID ]
Research Tools

Discourse Analysis

Semantic discourse categories assigned by Claude Haiku — 14 DH-informed categories classifying how commenters frame their arguments.

Comments Labeled
44,412
of 487,977 total
Coverage
9.1%
of eligible comments
Categories Active
14
of 14 discourse types
Avg Confidence
0.807
classifier confidence
Model
Claude Haiku
multi-label classification

Search & Filter

Search comment text, filter by category or video
Clear all

Economic Argument

1,276 comments
Page 23 of 64
More inflation isn't going to affect most of us. We've already had so much that we can't afford anything anyway. If a house already costs a million dollars who cares if it goes up to …
More inflation isn't going to affect most of us. We've already had so much that we can't afford anything anyway. If a house already costs a million dollars who cares if it goes up to 100 million. Is truly not worth working during this period of time until work pays a living again. I'm at the point I'd rather go live off the land on a commune
Discusses inflation, housing costs, and wage stagnation as barriers to livelihood, grounded in personal economic experience.
@JamesComeaux-n9w Mar 4, 2025
Canada has not been straight with the US. I am IBEW. I have work side-by-side with countless Canadians who are in the IBW. I have never worked side-by-side with the US IBEW worker who has …
Canada has not been straight with the US. I am IBEW. I have work side-by-side with countless Canadians who are in the IBW. I have never worked side-by-side with the US IBEW worker who has ever worked in Canada. Also Canada has been subsidizing their lumber mills for years, not charging them for The timber so they have an unfair advantage. Let’s let Canada pay their fair share to protect themselves instead of depend on the US to protect them.
Combines personal work experience with economic grievances about subsidies and unfair trade advantages, arguing Canada should pay more for defense.
@josephwhite8495 Mar 4, 2025
Canada will lose business permanently. The longer this goes the more they lose. Hurts them twenty times more than it hurts the US. We won't even notice.
Canada will lose business permanently. The longer this goes the more they lose. Hurts them twenty times more than it hurts the US. We won't even notice.
Argues that Canada will suffer greater economic harm than the US from an unspecified policy, using comparative economic impact reasoning.
@MinusEighty Mar 4, 2025
We love America and Americans, but if someone attacks Canadian sovereignty, we will fight back. If the Canadian government invites China to invest in Technology, Agriculture, Automotive, and Oil, Canada will emerge as a different, …
We love America and Americans, but if someone attacks Canadian sovereignty, we will fight back. If the Canadian government invites China to invest in Technology, Agriculture, Automotive, and Oil, Canada will emerge as a different, independent, and prosperous nation. This investment could create thousands of jobs, lower EV and fuel costs, generate significant tax revenue, and strengthen the economy, as Chinese EVs are more affordable than U.S. counterparts. Ultimately, lower energy costs would decrease the cost of living and boost Canadians' spending power, attracting foreign investors to Canada.
Proposes Chinese investment as economic solution to create jobs, lower costs, and strengthen Canadian independence and prosperity.
@rayhaankhan9871 Mar 4, 2025
Ask how Canadians are taxed far more than a tariff, GST tax, HST tax, PST tax, carbon tax (increasing 25% April 1), federal income tax, provincial income tax, capital gains tax, land transfer tax, airport …
Ask how Canadians are taxed far more than a tariff, GST tax, HST tax, PST tax, carbon tax (increasing 25% April 1), federal income tax, provincial income tax, capital gains tax, land transfer tax, airport tax, luxury tax, fuel surcharge tax
Enumerates multiple tax mechanisms to argue Canadians are overtaxed, combining economic impact discussion with implicit policy criticism.
@kimlitwin1254 Mar 4, 2025
Canada doesn't practice fair trade with the US. DJT is fixing it. Get over it, we're tired of being screwed.
Canada doesn't practice fair trade with the US. DJT is fixing it. Get over it, we're tired of being screwed.
Focuses on trade fairness and economic disadvantage to Canada, with comparative framing against the US.
@sparkstigator Mar 4, 2025
US GDP 12t, Canada 2t. I think the US is going to be just fine.
US GDP 12t, Canada 2t. I think the US is going to be just fine.
Compares GDP figures between US and Canada to argue about relative economic strength and resilience.
@jbkg5898 Mar 4, 2025
The problem is America is in debt.
The problem is America is in debt.
Identifies US national debt as the root cause of economic tensions and trade disputes.
@ChrisChris-yr2mq Mar 4, 2025
Canada benefit from us more than we benefit from them. Its not like we have money pouring in from Canada. Fuxk Canada!!!
Canada benefit from us more than we benefit from them. Its not like we have money pouring in from Canada. Fuxk Canada!!!
Claims Canada benefits more economically from the US relationship, framed as us-vs-them economic comparison.
@DavidRodgers-f1c Mar 4, 2025
Trump and his Tariffs will be Trouble for lay men
Trump and his Tariffs will be Trouble for lay men
Comment expresses concern about tariffs' negative economic impact on ordinary people, combining economic and threat-based reasoning.
@JamesBond7E Mar 4, 2025
Never winners in a trade war.
Never winners in a trade war.
Makes a general economic claim about trade wars being universally detrimental.
@peghiggins124 Mar 4, 2025
Yall are sheep. \nEvery country needs imports. But America relies on so many other countries to keep itself going is more than unhealthy. If China and the US went to war, yes, China would suffer. …
Yall are sheep. \nEvery country needs imports. But America relies on so many other countries to keep itself going is more than unhealthy. If China and the US went to war, yes, China would suffer. But look around your house, I bet most of it says - Made In China. That can NOT happen to the extent it is. \n\nFun Fact- when Russia, Ukraine war started, Russia couldn’t get Coke ( Soda ) now Russia has many knock offs that they say taste just like ours. Point is, Russia started making their own. Yes, the US will always need imports. But did you know over a dozen + countries already have & had tariffs on the US for a LONG time, some are even our “ Allies “. Do you know why they do it? To protect their economy. To protect domestic goods. The short term is always the hardest. But it’s been proven that the long run, tariffs actually help a country’s economy. Also, the US gets shafted when it comes down to a lot of trade deals. Yeah, okay, imports are great… ( If you are getting a good deal )
Extended argument about tariffs, trade dependencies, and economic protectionism using comparative examples from Russia, China, and the US.
@2023DodgeRam Mar 4, 2025
For normal people it will be expensive
For normal people it will be expensive
Directly addresses economic impact of tariffs on ordinary consumers.
@horizon4351 Mar 4, 2025
America First! This will bring more jobs to the US. More entrepreneurs. More opportunities! Americans approve of the job Trump is doing!
America First! This will bring more jobs to the US. More entrepreneurs. More opportunities! Americans approve of the job Trump is doing!
Comment emphasizes job creation and economic opportunities while asserting American national interest and approval.
@arthurjacksonjr6432 Mar 4, 2025
For all those who voted for Trump....yes all these tariffs mean harm to the American citizens in rising costs that we will not be able to afford, as we are already struggling......listen to Canada speech …
For all those who voted for Trump....yes all these tariffs mean harm to the American citizens in rising costs that we will not be able to afford, as we are already struggling......listen to Canada speech to us.....
Focuses on economic harm from tariffs to American citizens while expressing agreement with Canada's position.
@VickijuneRose-h1d Mar 4, 2025
THANK ALL OF THE TRUDEAU AND CARNEY VOTERS. YOU CAUSED THIS AND THINGS WILL GET WORSE. OUR HIGH TAXES GO TO THESE ASYLUM SEEKERS AND NEW COMERS THAT ARE RECEIVING ALL THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING. WE …
THANK ALL OF THE TRUDEAU AND CARNEY VOTERS. YOU CAUSED THIS AND THINGS WILL GET WORSE. OUR HIGH TAXES GO TO THESE ASYLUM SEEKERS AND NEW COMERS THAT ARE RECEIVING ALL THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING. WE ARE GETTING MORE AND MORE BU THE DAY AND OUR TAXES WILL CONTINUE TO GO UP. WHAT DO WE DO? LEAVE CANADA AND STOP PAYING THESE TAXES TO SUPPORT THIS?????
Focuses on tax burden, government spending on immigrants, and economic consequences, framed as unsustainable fiscal policy.
HonestReviewer-k4q Aug 27, 2025
This only gonna hurt the working people, how does this help anyone . It only benefits the government
This only gonna hurt the working people, how does this help anyone . It only benefits the government
Focuses on economic impact on working people and questions the distributional benefits of tariff policy.
@fr3shJ Mar 4, 2025
Very true nobody wins in a trade war!
Very true nobody wins in a trade war!
Discusses economic impact of trade wars, asserting mutual negative consequences.
@wankerka Mar 4, 2025
Canada is great eh, i'll be eating my $3.00 CAD eggs tomorrow morning with my $1.50 Starbucks coffee. Tariff away
Canada is great eh, i'll be eating my $3.00 CAD eggs tomorrow morning with my $1.50 Starbucks coffee. Tariff away
Comment uses sarcasm about rising food prices due to tariffs while sarcastically endorsing tariff policy, combining economic concern with ironic humor.
@SouthCanada Mar 5, 2025
From Denmark; When your country imports 20% of the country's electricity consumption, 50% of the country's oil consumption, and 90% of the country's gas consumption from Canada, then it is quite unintelligent to start a …
From Denmark; When your country imports 20% of the country's electricity consumption, 50% of the country's oil consumption, and 90% of the country's gas consumption from Canada, then it is quite unintelligent to start a trade war with Canada.
Uses Denmark's perspective to argue against trade war based on economic interdependence and energy imports from Canada.
@larsHenkel Mar 4, 2025
« Prev 23 / 64 Next »

Compare Videos

Select 2–4 videos to compare their discourse profiles side by side (% of labeled comments).

Discourse Taxonomy

Click a category to filter comments

Category Distribution

Primary discourse type assigned to each comment

Classifier Confidence

Distribution of confidence scores across all labeled comments

Discourse Over Time

Top 6 discourse types by month — how framing evolves over time

Category Co-occurrence

Which discourse types most frequently appear together on the same comment

Top Channels by Discourse Type

Which YouTube channels attract each type of discourse
Identity Assertion
CNN 2,313
Tyler Oliveira 1,991
RocaNews 467
JamCan 274
Yoke Immigration Canada 89
Solidarity
CNN 4,297
Tyler Oliveira 400
RocaNews 75
JamCan 36
CTV Your Morning 32
Policy Critique
CNN 3,445
Tyler Oliveira 551
Toronto Sun 340
CTV News 268
RocaNews 235
Humor / Satire
CNN 2,078
Tyler Oliveira 1,667
RocaNews 241
Global News 89
CTV News 68
Fear / Threat
Tyler Oliveira 1,549
CNN 1,332
RocaNews 321
JamCan 204
Toronto Sun 118
Meta-Commentary
Tyler Oliveira 1,702
CNN 1,478
RocaNews 168
CTV News 81
JamCan 77
Unverified Claim
CNN 1,480
Tyler Oliveira 820
RocaNews 203
Yoke Immigration Canada 203
JamCan 152
Moral Argument
CNN 1,733
Tyler Oliveira 704
RocaNews 205
JamCan 73
CTV Your Morning 23
Classified by Claude Haiku (Anthropic) | 14-category DH taxonomy | Search | Discourse Quality (Perspective API)