Skip to content
Canadian Immigration Dashboard [ CID ]
Research Tools

Discourse Analysis

Semantic discourse categories assigned by Claude Haiku — 14 DH-informed categories classifying how commenters frame their arguments.

Comments Labeled
44,412
of 487,977 total
Coverage
9.1%
of eligible comments
Categories Active
14
of 14 discourse types
Avg Confidence
0.807
classifier confidence
Model
Claude Haiku
multi-label classification

Search & Filter

Search comment text, filter by category or video
Clear all

Economic Argument

1,276 comments
Page 24 of 64
these governments allow it to happen because these are the type of people they can and will pay less for the same amount of work.
these governments allow it to happen because these are the type of people they can and will pay less for the same amount of work.
Argues that immigration policy enables wage suppression and labor exploitation for economic gain.
Chriss-oy2nk Jan 27, 2026
They are not paid for by the Feds. It's paid by over taxed and beleaguered Canadians like ME! I want it to stop!!!!!
They are not paid for by the Feds. It's paid by over taxed and beleaguered Canadians like ME! I want it to stop!!!!!
Argues that Canadian taxpayers bear the cost of immigration programs and demands cessation of spending.
cell2086 Feb 24, 2026
Canadians can't afford the Canadian dream.never mind adding immigration
Canadians can't afford the Canadian dream.never mind adding immigration
Argues that domestic affordability crises make immigration policy economically unsustainable for existing citizens.
gv8507 Feb 17, 2026
57k is poverty in 2026
57k is poverty in 2026
Comment critiques the adequacy of wages/income ($57k) in the context of current economic conditions, framing it as insufficient.
Terry_Aki_Soss Jan 6, 2026
The net effect is positive for the US and it will reduce the trade deficit and more over he can use the surplus to offer subsidies while also reducing the national debt as well. This …
The net effect is positive for the US and it will reduce the trade deficit and more over he can use the surplus to offer subsidies while also reducing the national debt as well. This is a good play from Trump, but the liberals will never understand him because they think with their emotions.
Argues Trump's trade policy reduces US deficit and enables subsidies/debt reduction, framing it as economically sound while dismissing liberal emotional reasoning.
@FunukwaziPhungula Mar 4, 2025
tough talk but who will pay.......the citizens of Canada....and once they feel enough pain.....their politicians will come groveling back to President Trump just like he did last time
tough talk but who will pay.......the citizens of Canada....and once they feel enough pain.....their politicians will come groveling back to President Trump just like he did last time
Focuses on economic pain to Canadian citizens as consequence of tariff policy, with implicit criticism of political response.
@LawrenceWeber-z5o Mar 5, 2025
Good luck! You bring nothing to the table. Your country is almost broke! ?
Good luck! You bring nothing to the table. Your country is almost broke! ?
Attacks Canada's economic viability and financial status while dismissing its value.
@geetompkins5794 Mar 4, 2025
These tariffs were just matched what they had on the US.. this isn’t even a trade war, just matching what you were doing to us lol
These tariffs were just matched what they had on the US.. this isn’t even a trade war, just matching what you were doing to us lol
Discusses tariffs and trade policy, arguing Canada is matching existing US tariffs rather than initiating conflict.
@Baker308 Mar 4, 2025
Can any American tell me, as of March 3 why would any Canadian buy an American built car that has a 25% tariff on it when we can buy from 15 other countries with ZERO …
Can any American tell me, as of March 3 why would any Canadian buy an American built car that has a 25% tariff on it when we can buy from 15 other countries with ZERO tariffs.
Commenter raises economic logic about tariffs and trade alternatives, framed as an information-seeking question about rational consumer behavior.
@SteveB.-sn4df Mar 4, 2025
Listen, the numbers don’t look good for Canada. America have the resources to withstand long term pains of tariff while Canada can only withstand a short term before a serious recession
Listen, the numbers don’t look good for Canada. America have the resources to withstand long term pains of tariff while Canada can only withstand a short term before a serious recession
Analyzes Canada's economic vulnerability compared to the U.S. in the context of tariff impacts.
@pandassassinoverlord9252 Mar 4, 2025
Can someone please tell Trump Canada is our friend. They have given lives in our wars. They are going to find other customers for their oil while our auto industry will be trashed. They will …
Can someone please tell Trump Canada is our friend. They have given lives in our wars. They are going to find other customers for their oil while our auto industry will be trashed. They will find other countries to buy their lumber while the cost of building American homes soars. It will be easy for Canada, Mexico and China to come out ahead in this trade war. Trump’s understanding of economics and international trade is at the sixth grade level- and not a very bright sixth grader. Finally where is Trumps plan to protect American families and workers? Where is the national resolve to work together to get through this?
Focuses on economic consequences of trade war (oil markets, auto industry, lumber prices, housing costs, 401k impacts) and critiques Trump's economic competence and trade understanding.
@righteousisthelord180 Mar 4, 2025
The consumers always pay for it.Tarffis only enrich the rich
The consumers always pay for it.Tarffis only enrich the rich
Argues that tariffs harm consumers while benefiting the wealthy, focusing on economic distribution impacts.
@judaslovesjesus1530 Mar 4, 2025
I'm planning to buy Ford Escape I changed my mind to Toyota Rav4..
I'm planning to buy Ford Escape I changed my mind to Toyota Rav4..
Describes a consumer purchasing decision influenced by economic or trade considerations.
@donzkietv168 Mar 4, 2025
dear USA, we are going to find new customers for our raw goods. We most likely will not go back. You are discounting how many raw goods come from Canada
dear USA, we are going to find new customers for our raw goods. We most likely will not go back. You are discounting how many raw goods come from Canada
Focuses on economic leverage through trade relationships and raw goods exports as a strategic response to tariffs.
@louisemason2918 Mar 4, 2025
All these years US has a trade deficit of 1 trillion dollars every year. With tariffs we could have recovered 250 billion every year. That is a lot of money. Currently every American owes $110,000 …
All these years US has a trade deficit of 1 trillion dollars every year. With tariffs we could have recovered 250 billion every year. That is a lot of money. Currently every American owes $110,000 because of the accumulated debt of 36.5 trillion.\n\nJustin, how long are we supposed to bend back wards while US has a trade deficit of trillion dollar over the past 20 years. Why cant to you balance the imports and exports so that you don't have to keep taking advantage of USA. CNN did not see the trade deficit every single year for 20 years? what are they talking about? Our news channels have just become political entities rather than looking for the greater good of the Americans. One is for Republicans and others for Democrats - ridiculous. \n\nCanada and Mexico are saying, please stop tariffs, it is going to hurt America. LOL. No it is not. If tariffs were there in 2024, US would have gotten back 15 billion dollar revenue from Canada and Mexico would have paid 46 billion to USA. All this time, this was affecting only Americans and while you are enjoying not paying for your share, you have made US pay by taking loans to pay for the imports increasing our Debt. Yes it has been hurting America for the past 20 years, otherwise how did we accumulate 36.5 trillion debt.\n\nLike Justin said, if Canada can survive while paying 15 billion to USA, of course USA will do fine while collecting the 15 billion from Canada and 46 billion form Mexico. What do you all think that the public is blind?\n\nTo the American Public: Why would we impose tariffs, if that is going to hurt the US. And why are Canada and Mexico shaking in their boots? It would be naive, if you think it is out of their good heart. It had been hurting US for the past 20 years and they did not care. This time it is going to hurt them so all this fuss. The bottom line is that they don't want to pay all the excess that they have been dumping on us while they were benefiting. USA will use the revenue generated (total around 250 billion for 2025 form tariffs) to reduce our tax, make things more affordable, inject in to our own businesses and generate more employment.
Extensive discussion of trade deficits, tariffs, debt accumulation, and economic impact on both countries; critiques current trade policy through economic data.
@jayreddy6887 Mar 4, 2025
USA has been getting f cked trading with Canada and we are tired of paying to protect them while sucking up to the Chinese. ❤
USA has been getting f cked trading with Canada and we are tired of paying to protect them while sucking up to the Chinese. ❤
Frames trade imbalance between USA and Canada as economic burden, comparing relative costs and benefits.
@DarinMullins Mar 4, 2025
I think the house prices is going to be collapsed
I think the house prices is going to be collapsed
Discusses housing market collapse as an economic concern, relevant to immigration's economic impact debate.
Mar 4, 2025
Canadians, you do understand that anything american we buy will be 25% more expensive, right? Not because of Trump, but because of Trudeau. You apply tariffs on what you import, not export.
Canadians, you do understand that anything american we buy will be 25% more expensive, right? Not because of Trump, but because of Trudeau. You apply tariffs on what you import, not export.
Explains economic impact of tariffs on consumer prices while critiquing misunderstanding of trade policy mechanics and attributing blame to Trudeau.
@tnbproduction Mar 4, 2025
Yall are sheep. \nEvery country needs imports. But America relies on so many other countries to keep itself going is more than unhealthy. If China and the US went to war, yes, China would suffer. …
Yall are sheep. \nEvery country needs imports. But America relies on so many other countries to keep itself going is more than unhealthy. If China and the US went to war, yes, China would suffer. But look around your house, I bet most of it says - Made In China. That can NOT happen to the extent it is. \n\nFun Fact- when Russia, Ukraine war started, Russia couldn’t get Coke ( Soda ) now Russia has many knock offs that they say taste just like ours. Point is, Russia started making their own. Yes, the US will always need imports. But did you know over a dozen + countries already have & had tariffs on the US for a LONG time, some are even our “ Allies “. Do you know why they do it? To protect their economy. To protect domestic goods. The short term is always the hardest. But it’s been proven that the long run, tariffs actually help a country’s economy. Also, the US gets shafted when it comes down to a lot of trade deals. Yeah, okay, imports are great… ( If you are getting a good deal )
Extended argument about tariffs, trade dependencies, and economic protectionism using comparative examples from Russia, China, and the US.
@2023DodgeRam Mar 4, 2025
Americans buy American made products; simple.
Americans buy American made products; simple.
Justifies protectionist economic behavior through consumer preference for domestic products.
@jtbrokenharted Mar 4, 2025
« Prev 24 / 64 Next »

Compare Videos

Select 2–4 videos to compare their discourse profiles side by side (% of labeled comments).

Discourse Taxonomy

Click a category to filter comments

Category Distribution

Primary discourse type assigned to each comment

Classifier Confidence

Distribution of confidence scores across all labeled comments

Discourse Over Time

Top 6 discourse types by month — how framing evolves over time

Category Co-occurrence

Which discourse types most frequently appear together on the same comment

Top Channels by Discourse Type

Which YouTube channels attract each type of discourse
Identity Assertion
CNN 2,313
Tyler Oliveira 1,991
RocaNews 467
JamCan 274
Yoke Immigration Canada 89
Solidarity
CNN 4,297
Tyler Oliveira 400
RocaNews 75
JamCan 36
CTV Your Morning 32
Policy Critique
CNN 3,445
Tyler Oliveira 551
Toronto Sun 340
CTV News 268
RocaNews 235
Humor / Satire
CNN 2,078
Tyler Oliveira 1,667
RocaNews 241
Global News 89
CTV News 68
Fear / Threat
Tyler Oliveira 1,549
CNN 1,332
RocaNews 321
JamCan 204
Toronto Sun 118
Meta-Commentary
Tyler Oliveira 1,702
CNN 1,478
RocaNews 168
CTV News 81
JamCan 77
Unverified Claim
CNN 1,480
Tyler Oliveira 820
RocaNews 203
Yoke Immigration Canada 203
JamCan 152
Moral Argument
CNN 1,733
Tyler Oliveira 704
RocaNews 205
JamCan 73
CTV Your Morning 23
Classified by Claude Haiku (Anthropic) | 14-category DH taxonomy | Search | Discourse Quality (Perspective API)