Toxicity Scores & Embeddings

what truly pisses me off is losing our holidays cause they dont celebrate them. this is my country your free to come and live here but fillow the rules your not allowed to shove religion down anyone throat your suppose to prayer away cause thats your right but tp shove it down and make us a slave to a god i dont believe in? as a first nation on my land. smarten the fuck up and respect the people who allow you to run from the disgraces of your own country you dont want to help but come here to destroy. my bloodline was here first before the whites so i have a right to say what i say. and if i get hate for my free speech then you also dont belong in this country

Close the borders the muslims are crazy we have way to much here Canada is now a joke freedom of speech for white people doesn't exist its a joke everytime we say anything we are racist or they say white privelage in other countrys say africa example were its prominent ly black what do they call rich people black privileged white people call it rich privileged not white privileged so crazy

guy on the bike say that "indians are generally a dirty people" just as easy as ordering a big mac. he got nuttin to hide. exercising his freedom of speech like a champ. lol

We can no longer fix this issue because the majority or our country is IMMIGRANTS! They literally can out vote real Canadians. We have lost our country. The west doesn’t even get a say in federal politics…immigration is a multi billion dollar industry. There is nothing left in this country for our children and I am truly scared to grow old here with millions of immigrants who hate us and our country, running everything and filling our medical system. Whites are blames for being racist yet anyone with common sense can see whites are the LEAST racist of all. We are doomed, and quite honestly this country isn’t worrh fighting for…we don’t have free speech or the right to self preservation for a country that won’t stfu about ‘human rights’

🚩🚫🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 🌙 1. **Ras Leela with married women** Bhagavata Purana 10.33.27 Krishna danced with married Gopis in the forest at night. Even though they left their husbands, the scripture says: Whatever Krishna does is pure, even if He plays with others’ wives. 🛑 Normalizes adultery under divine excuse. 🩲 2. **Stealing clothes and watching girls naked** Bhagavata Purana 10.22.1 to 10.22.28 Krishna hides the clothes of young bathing girls, climbs a tree, and watches them come out of the river **naked with hands raised**. He says it’s a test of their devotion. 😳 Highly inappropriate by any ethical standard. 💍 3. **Sex with 16,000 women** Bhagavata Purana 10.59.42 After killing Narakasura, Krishna takes 16,000 captive women as wives. He is said to live with them all by creating multiple forms of himself. ⚠️ Glorifies mass polygamy and male domination. 🧈 4. **Stealing butter and lying about it** Bhagavata Purana 10.8 to 10.11 Krishna frequently steals butter from villagers and breaks their pots. Even when caught, he lies and charms his way out. 😂 Presented as playful, but glorifies theft and dishonesty. 🔪 5. **Killing Ekalavya, a tribal archer** Mahabharata, Adi Parva and Bhagavata Purana 10.52.31 Ekalavya, a low-caste boy, learns archery on his own. Drona cuts off his thumb. Later Krishna kills him, calling him unrighteous. 🚫 Reinforces caste violence against talented lower-caste individuals. 📿 6. **Supports caste system in Gita** Bhagavad Gita 4.13 Krishna says: I created the four varnas (castes) based on qualities and actions. Although interpreted philosophically, this verse was used for centuries to enforce caste discrimination. 📛 Justifies systemic social inequality. 🗣️ 7. **Killing Shishupala for verbal insults** Mahabharata, Sabha Parva During a royal ceremony, Shishupala mocks Krishna. Krishna responds by using his chakra to **behead him publicly**. 🧠 Kills someone for speech — raises moral concerns. #rama Unethical, Weird ❌🚩🚩🚩🚩👺🚩🚩❤🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 Acts of Rama in Ramayana These are all from mainstream Valmiki Ramayana or well-known regional versions. 1. 💔 Banishing Sita While Pregnant — Based on Gossip Rama sends Sita to the forest alone while she is pregnant, based on a washerman’s comment about her “purity.” 🕉️ Uttara Kanda, Valmiki Ramayana “A ruler must be free from blame. I banish you to uphold my people’s trust.” Comment: Seriously? Gossip over your wife? This is not ideal leadership or love — it’s cruel and cowardly. 2. ⚔️ Killing Shambuka the Shudra for Doing Tapas Rama beheads a Shudra ascetic just because he was doing penance in the forest, which “violated dharma.” 🕉️ Uttara Kanda, Ramayana “By performing penance, the Shudra threatens the cosmic order. He must die.” Comment: Casteist horror. What kind of god kills someone for meditating? 3. 🐒 Making Monkeys Fight His War Instead of asking help from humans, Rama uses an army of monkeys (Vanaras) — like Hanuman, Sugreeva, etc. 🔹 Comment: Literal monkey business. Why use animals for war instead of diplomacy? Slaying Vali Unfairly from Behind a Tree Rama hides and shoots Vali from behind while he's fighting someone else (Sugreeva). 🕉️ Kishkindha Kanda “A king can kill from hiding when dharma is at stake.” 🔹 Comment: That’s just sneaky and cowardly, not heroic. 🔥 Asking Sita to Do Agni Pariksha (Fire Test) After rescuing her from Ravana, Rama demands she walk through fire to prove her purity. 🕉️ Yuddha Kanda, Valmiki Ramayana “I rescued you for honor, not for love. Prove your chastity.” 🔹 Comment: Toxic masculinity. Instead of comforting her, he humiliates her. Never Defending Sita Against Critics He allows society to question Sita again and again, never confronting the toxic moral policing. 🔹 Comment: Doesn’t defend his wife. Silent when he should speak. 7. 🪦 Abandoning His Children in Forest His twin sons, Lava and Kusha, are born and raised without knowing who their father is. 🔹 Comment: A father who abandons family, then fights his own sons without knowing. Blind Obedience to Dharma, No Compassion Rama is shown as a king who follows “Rajdharma” even when it destroys his personal life. 🔹 Comment: Robot-like morality — no real humanity or emotion. ❓🤔 So… Why the “Jai Shri Ram” Hype? Originally a devotional phrase, “Jai Shri Ram” has now become: 🚩 1. Political Slogan (Not JustReligious) Widely used by Hindutva groups (like RSS, Bajrang Dal, etc.) Chanted during hate crimes, riots, and lynchings Used to assert Hindu supremacy, not peace or devotion Brainwashed Symbolism Kids in schools, people on streets forced to chant it Becomes reflex rather than real devotion 🔊 3. Used in Intimidation Many victims of hate attacks in India were forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram” before being beaten or killed. 🔹 Example: Tabrez (Jharkhand), 2019 🔹 Example: Delhi Riots, 2020 Fake Masculinity & Heroism Rama is projected as “Hindu warrior king” — even though real Ramayana presents him as soft, conflicted, and Fake Masculinity & Heroism Rama is projected as “Hindu warrior king” — even though real Ramayana presents him as soft, conflicted, and emotional The aggressive macho image is fake propaganda

Ty for all the immigrants that want to be a canadian for speaking up us white Canadians we can actually go to jail for saying anything for hate speech and possibly hate crimes.

11:00 what did sikh man say that they can't speak freely in india?😂 What a joke? People literally abuse every govt on India online offline doesn't matter it's left or right..indian doesn't have civic sense doesn't follow rule especially those traffic rules in Brampton and in india bcoz in india they got too much freedom in the name of so fundamental rights,free speech..... These people go in foreign countries and say they got tortured by indian govt they don't have freedom like seriously? This is literally hilarious things....99% Sikh driving truck in foreign countries and talking about freedom... Educated, middle class sikh working in India , have sikh military regiment, and punjab state have Sikh govt and they aren't able to speak right? Govt need to indentify such traitors.....and cancel their Visa and sieze Thier property in India......

This mass immigration is deliberate and if you follow global politics you will see this isn’t just happening in Canada. It’s happening in the UK FRANCE GERMANY IRELAND SCOTLAND AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND POLAND HUNGARY BRUSSELS SPAIN ITALY PORTUGAL some of the above nations have woken up and have said enough. Both Poland and Hungary have said enough. Now the EU is calling them racists. It’s all Indian or Muslim immigration. They don’t immigrate for a better life it’s to take over and it’s millions of fighting g age men too. Our countries are setting up for award, civil wars. France just issued a memo to hospitals to get ready for military mass casualties that will start within 12 months from now. These globalists have been planning this great reset and new world order for many decades. I stared investigating these wicked globalists over a decade ago now. I have all evidence and receipts saved. How do you implode a nation, crash an economy, make citizens reliant on govt for everything… why bring in millions of immigrants and put their needs first. You can go to any city or town in Canada now. It’s hard to find a Canadian working. In Canada we have foreign workers programs that allows businesses to hire foreigners and the liberal federal govt pays 1/3 of these foreigners salaries. So of course any business like retail or restaurant’s biggest overhead is labour costs so if they can save like $6.00 an hour on every employee why wouldn’t they opt in for that. I also did a very deep dive into the voters in Canada. At least 4.5 million out of the 8.5 million voted the Carney liberals got in April 2025 were immigrant votes. That’s why Carney and liberals pander to the gigantic Muslim population in Canada. Muslims, Chinese, Indians from India, Ukrainians, Filipinos they all pretty much vote liberal. There weee over 100 Muslim groups that told their Muslim community to only vote for candidates that support Gaza Muslims and Palestinians. How is that not election interference. We know the Chinese directly interfere in our elections by threatening Chinese Canadians to vote liberal or their families in China will be harmed or they will be harmed inside Canada. In June Carney said Muslim values are Canadian values. Either this clown has no idea how radical Islam is or he knows and just panders for votes. Liberal cabinet ministers Anita Anand and Melanie Joly they both openly campaigned saying they must support Palestine because they both have large Muslim populations in their respective ridings. Over half of the liberal voter base is foreign now. I started in 2019 telling the federal conservatives look the liberals are importing new liberal voters. The party needs a strategy to win over the immigrant vote. I proposed hiring a team of individuals from the Muslim community, Chinese community etc to brainstorm on how to get their message across that if your an immigrant your best to vote conservative because the liberals don’t care about them they just want their vote. Show them how they may never own a home, how their kids will be worse off than them. That buy bringing in about 2 million more immigrants a year it is causing inflation and the affordability crisis. I believe if you can show these immigrant communities the truth they may consider voting conservative. Bit of the conservatives refuse to pivot we will never see another federal conservative govt in our lifetimes. It’s not racist it’s the truth. We need a foreign registry act to kick out foreign entities that harass bully and threaten immigrants in Canada to bend the knee or else. If we have 100 Islamic groups telling their community it’s yo only vote one way charge them with election interference. We need electoral reform badly in Canada. We need to end all immigration to Canada for at least 5 years maybe even 10. We need to deport those here illegally. No more fake asylum claims. This country can still be saved but we need immigrants on board to help save it. We need to remove broadcasting licenses of mainstream media networks that lie and bash conservatives. That’s deliberate political interference. It’s time we enforce the law. No more hate speech or hate crimes against any community especially the Jews. Deport these ppl back to Gaza if they are here on visas or revoke their citizenship and send them packing. We need ICE in Canada like they have in America. It’s long over due. If we get a hold of our borders and we stop the drugs we would have a new trade deal with Trump tomorrow. Carney doesn’t want that because it’s all he has to fear monger ppl oh bad Trump me Tarzan me good bad orange man. Haven’t you had enough now Canada? Wake up before it’s too late for anyone to save this country.

Pierre Poilievre’s Immigration Hypocrisy: A Study in Convenient Principles Disguised as Conviction Pierre Poilievre has never met a border he did not want to fortify, a refugee claim he did not want to scrutinize, or an irregular crossing he did not want to turn into a national morality play. For years, he has warned Canadians that the country is being overrun by “illegal border crossers,” “queue jumping asylum seekers,” and “abusers of the system.” He delivers these warnings with the solemnity of a man announcing a biblical plague, not a handful of exhausted families walking across a ditch in Quebec. In Poilievre’s political universe, Roxham Road is not a rural footpath. It is a symbol of national decline. It is chaos incarnate. It is the place where the rule of law goes to die. It is, in short, the perfect stage upon which he can perform his favorite role: the lone defender of order in a world gone soft. At least, that is the story he tells the public. The private story, as publicly reported, is considerably less heroic. The Public Record That Refuses to Behave: According to reporting from The Breach and the National Observer, someone described as the uncle of Poilievre’s spouse has an immigration history that reads like a greatest hits compilation of everything Poilievre claims to oppose. The reporting outlines that he entered Canada and made a refugee claim. That claim was refused. A deportation order was issued. He later re-entered Canada through Roxham Road. He then filed a humanitarian and compassionate application. Poilievre’s spouse reportedly helped prepare that application. This is not fringe gossip. This is what journalists documented through correspondence, interviews, and immigration records. In other words, the exact pathway Poilievre condemns as “abuse of the system” is the same pathway publicly reported to have been used by someone connected to him. And suddenly, the man who treats Roxham Road like a national security breach becomes quieter than a library at midnight. The slogans stop. The outrage evaporates. The border, once a sacred line, becomes a flexible suggestion. The Rhetoric: A Symphony of Outrage: Poilievre’s immigration rhetoric is a carefully orchestrated performance. He warns that irregular border crossings undermine the rule of law. He insists humanitarian and compassionate applications are loopholes. He claims the system is being gamed. He declares that Canada must “take back control.” He delivers these lines with the moral certainty of a man who believes compassion is a gateway drug. In his speeches, asylum seekers are not people. They are symbols. They are props. They are the raw material from which he fashions his political identity. He is the sheriff. They are the threat. The border is the battleground. And Canada is the damsel in distress. It is a compelling narrative. It is also a narrative that collapses the moment it becomes personally inconvenient. The Reality: A Study in Elastic Principles: When someone connected to Poilievre uses the very same system he condemns, the rules change with breathtaking speed. Irregular border crossings are no longer a crisis. They are a misunderstanding. A technicality. A regrettable but understandable choice. Humanitarian and compassionate applications are no longer loopholes. They are legitimate pathways. Necessary tools. Evidence of a compassionate system. The border is no longer a sacred line. It is a suggestion. A guideline. A flexible concept open to interpretation. It is a remarkable transformation, like watching a man insist that jaywalking is a crime against humanity until his friend does it, at which point it becomes a misunderstood act of civic expression. The Political Convenience of Shifting Standards: Poilievre’s political identity is built on the idea that he alone will restore order. He alone will enforce the rules. He alone will protect Canada from the chaos of irregular migration. But the moment the rules become inconvenient, they are no longer rules. They are preferences. They are vibes. They are whatever he needs them to be in the moment. This is not a minor contradiction. It is a fundamental collapse of the moral architecture he has built his political brand upon. If irregular crossings are a crisis, then they are a crisis for everyone. If humanitarian applications are loopholes, then they are loopholes for everyone. If the system is broken, then it is broken for everyone. But Poilievre’s version of justice is not universal. It is conditional. It is situational. It is deeply, profoundly personal. The Broader Pattern: Institutions Are Sacred Until They Are Not: This is not the first time Poilievre’s principles have proven to be more flexible than advertised. He has attacked the Supreme Court of Canada when its rulings do not align with his political needs. He has accused the justice system of being too lenient when it suits him and too harsh when it does not. He has framed himself as the defender of institutions while undermining them whenever they become inconvenient. It is a pattern. It is a habit. It is a worldview. And it reveals something essential about his politics. For Poilievre, institutions are not pillars of democracy. They are tools. They are props. They are instruments to be used when helpful and discarded when not. The Satirical Truth: A Philosophy in One Sentence: Pierre Poilievre’s immigration philosophy can now be summarized with clinical precision: Canada must crack down on irregular border crossings, except for the ones that are fine. And he will decide which ones are fine. It is a stance that bends so far backward it could qualify for a gymnastics medal. It is a stance that reveals more about political convenience than national security. It is a stance that exposes the gap between what Poilievre says and what Poilievre does. And it is a stance that makes one thing abundantly clear. Polievre's Hypocrisy

1 answer 82500 as soon as you step foot in Canada. I get 1650 on a pension it was 2700 last year which was 35,000 well that's just too much,im white don't deserve it since we conquered natives give them money way more than a white Canadian,and the chiefs get half a million spread among buddies live off reserve still no clean water definitely no oversight by government. I get taxed to pay immigrants welfare they do not get taxed and are practicing sharia law. Wife says partner left she has 4 to 6 kids 1800 a month per kid plus welfare benefits x 4 wives plus the husband collects on his own and the younger immigrants work shitty jobs while white kids can't get a summer job. The husband also takes a good portion of generous benefits to buy guns hide in mosques for coming jihadGovernment does nothing they loot western canada they will be gone as soon as they stolen enough . Taking our free speech turning canada into a communist hellscape. I havecollapsed arches they want 50 k but get this i still have to wait 3 yrs for a bed. How much will that cost in 3 years? Ive been paying into healthcare 52 years i want my money back.They expect us to give money to everyone sorry im for canada. They invest money in ridiculous climate scam b.s proven to not work carney doesn't care Brookfield and blackrock he is heavily invested in this government is the biggest threat to canada not Donald Trump.103 conflicts of interest 28trips around the world 3 times a lifetime carbon footprint this asshole globalist wef communist does not care about Canadians im too old im stuck here they just want me to take maid save money.

Canada has hate speech laws so Im sure some were too afraid to say the truth on camera