Toxicity Scores & Embeddings

Canadas crap anyway and full off crack heads same uk same USA

3:57 No way this Pigger on bike calling us dirty while they literally live on street and smoke crack all day. Whites are generally filthy too. They literally have 2 Girl 1 Cup culture 😭

You crack me up the way you change your accent. It's SUPER obvious you don't speak a damn word😂😂😂

Do what we do in russia, Crack their heads open!!!!

The USB is going after fraudulent students from India, they apply fr refiugee status even though there';s no war in india, fake grades, etc and any country that cracks down they just swarm into other countries like the UK/Australia. no one here has the balls to go after these fraudsters and kick them out

White people crack down on sex offenders only to replace themselves with people that do not😂

By that logic America, Canada is European invasion nations. Just because filthy pakistanis/bangladeshi destroy your culture and doesn't get accustomed to it. And grape minor by running grooming gangs and looks brown doesn't mean. They are Indian. We Indians are loving, high tax paying, not indulging in crimes and peace loving people. Who mostly gets accustomed to other nations culture and also celebrate their festivals with the people of that nations. And we feel proud that whichever nation we go which provide us opportunities to give it back and it's society as much as we can. Just because mentioning India gets you clicks and it's easy to crack racist jokes about Indian online doesn't mean we the people are bad.

By that logic America, Canada is European invasion nations. Just because filthy pakistanis/bangladeshi destroy your culture and doesn't get accustomed to it. And grape minor by running grooming gangs and looks brown doesn't mean. They are Indian. We Indians are loving, high tax paying, not indulging in crimes and peace loving people. Who mostly gets accustomed to other nations culture and also celebrate their festivals with the people of that nations. And we feel proud that whichever nation we go which provide us opportunities to give it back and it's society as much as we can. Just because mentioning India gets you clicks and it's easy to crack racist jokes about Indian online doesn't mean we the people are bad.

Pay no taxes what world does that crack head live in

1:32 yea bro idk ow much u know ab canada these days but all the w ppl r crack heads lmfao

Good ole RocaNews, the immigrants moved in and made the area wealthy, and the whites hit the crack pipe😅😂

You claim not to be racist, yet you zoom in on a man wearing slides as if he’s committing a crime? You cut to videos of only filthy street food and people doing disgusting things, generalizing an entire country based on hateful reels that I know you make as well. This adds fuel to the fire. By your logic, you probably live in a crack den, surviving on canned beans and food I wouldn’t even feed my farm animals, doped up on speed, living the American dream? I should make a video showing Tyler Oliveira’s homeland and cut to montages of Kensington, Philadelphia, Skidrow, and all those poor homeless communities you visit and antagonize for views and money. I should show all the weirdos that you know wander the streets of the country you call home, hurting and killing people in the name of beef or some ridiculously moronic bullshit. At least I don’t have to worry about getting shot or kidnapped by masked men in my country, but go on, bro, focus on the poop slingers and beggars. I’m absolutely not against you making videos on such topics, highlighting the abuse of the immigration system in both countries is important and above that, is your right to express yourself or report on. However, adding these unwanted tangents for clout and view baiting is not the definition of “independent journalism” that you claim to do. I was a huge fan of yours, but ever since you started making content about immigrants in New York City, you’ve gone down a very dark path. I hope you reflect on your actions and reconsider your outlook on the world.

Ayo which crack head said not here point em out 😂im walk there right now and talk to them bout harrassing reports

I AM SO GLAD TRUMP IS IN OFFICE AND CRACKING DOWN ON MIGRANTS COMING INTO AMERICA. FOR YOU INDIA PEOPLE MOVING INTO ANOTHER COUNTRY AND CULTURE PUTTING STATUES ON SOMEONE ELSES LAND IS DISRESPECTFUL

You don’t see Indians doing street takeovers You don’t see Indians selling crack You don’t see Indians being violent You don’t see Indians running from the cops I think if we’re gonna have to deal with some immigration, the Indians aren’t the biggest problem

Bro your asking the crack heads downtown about this? Literally go anywhere else and ask the normal people 😅

Start cracking down on business who hire those illegal status foreigners.

They came on fraudulent student visas, with lies, those who had legal student visas, perfectly knew that there are steps towards immigration. Those who had fake visas, also perfectly knew the fact and pretended to be innocent with lies. Instead of following regulations, they started rioting in city squares, in city parks, making noise, throwing garbage. "Halt on Deportations: In response to the scandal, the Canadian government paused the deportation of the implicated students to investigate the situation further and consider alternative solutions.  Review of Cases:A process was put in place to review the cases of the affected students, particularly those who were victims of the fraud.  Fake Admissions:The students obtained their Canadian visas through a fraudulent agent who provided fake admission offers from Humber College, leading to their entry into the country.  Loss of Status:Upon discovering the fake letters, the students were deemed to have lost their study permit status, making them subject to deportation by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).  Political Pressure:The New Democratic Party (NDP) in Canada called on the government to not deport these students, highlighting their exploitation and the circumstances under which they were brought to Canada.  Crackdown on Scammers:The government and authorities also began cracking down on the agents and fraudulent institutions that facilitated this scam, as the students were often unaware of the forged nature of their documents, according to the Canadian Federation of Students.  Advocacy for Students:Organizations and Members of Parliament (MPs) called on the government to show leniency towards the students, highlighting their victim status and advocating for waivers of deportation.

Pierre Poilievre’s Immigration Hypocrisy: A Study in Convenient Principles Disguised as Conviction Pierre Poilievre has never met a border he did not want to fortify, a refugee claim he did not want to scrutinize, or an irregular crossing he did not want to turn into a national morality play. For years, he has warned Canadians that the country is being overrun by “illegal border crossers,” “queue jumping asylum seekers,” and “abusers of the system.” He delivers these warnings with the solemnity of a man announcing a biblical plague, not a handful of exhausted families walking across a ditch in Quebec. In Poilievre’s political universe, Roxham Road is not a rural footpath. It is a symbol of national decline. It is chaos incarnate. It is the place where the rule of law goes to die. It is, in short, the perfect stage upon which he can perform his favorite role: the lone defender of order in a world gone soft. At least, that is the story he tells the public. The private story, as publicly reported, is considerably less heroic. The Public Record That Refuses to Behave: According to reporting from The Breach and the National Observer, someone described as the uncle of Poilievre’s spouse has an immigration history that reads like a greatest hits compilation of everything Poilievre claims to oppose. The reporting outlines that he entered Canada and made a refugee claim. That claim was refused. A deportation order was issued. He later re-entered Canada through Roxham Road. He then filed a humanitarian and compassionate application. Poilievre’s spouse reportedly helped prepare that application. This is not fringe gossip. This is what journalists documented through correspondence, interviews, and immigration records. In other words, the exact pathway Poilievre condemns as “abuse of the system” is the same pathway publicly reported to have been used by someone connected to him. And suddenly, the man who treats Roxham Road like a national security breach becomes quieter than a library at midnight. The slogans stop. The outrage evaporates. The border, once a sacred line, becomes a flexible suggestion. The Rhetoric: A Symphony of Outrage: Poilievre’s immigration rhetoric is a carefully orchestrated performance. He warns that irregular border crossings undermine the rule of law. He insists humanitarian and compassionate applications are loopholes. He claims the system is being gamed. He declares that Canada must “take back control.” He delivers these lines with the moral certainty of a man who believes compassion is a gateway drug. In his speeches, asylum seekers are not people. They are symbols. They are props. They are the raw material from which he fashions his political identity. He is the sheriff. They are the threat. The border is the battleground. And Canada is the damsel in distress. It is a compelling narrative. It is also a narrative that collapses the moment it becomes personally inconvenient. The Reality: A Study in Elastic Principles: When someone connected to Poilievre uses the very same system he condemns, the rules change with breathtaking speed. Irregular border crossings are no longer a crisis. They are a misunderstanding. A technicality. A regrettable but understandable choice. Humanitarian and compassionate applications are no longer loopholes. They are legitimate pathways. Necessary tools. Evidence of a compassionate system. The border is no longer a sacred line. It is a suggestion. A guideline. A flexible concept open to interpretation. It is a remarkable transformation, like watching a man insist that jaywalking is a crime against humanity until his friend does it, at which point it becomes a misunderstood act of civic expression. The Political Convenience of Shifting Standards: Poilievre’s political identity is built on the idea that he alone will restore order. He alone will enforce the rules. He alone will protect Canada from the chaos of irregular migration. But the moment the rules become inconvenient, they are no longer rules. They are preferences. They are vibes. They are whatever he needs them to be in the moment. This is not a minor contradiction. It is a fundamental collapse of the moral architecture he has built his political brand upon. If irregular crossings are a crisis, then they are a crisis for everyone. If humanitarian applications are loopholes, then they are loopholes for everyone. If the system is broken, then it is broken for everyone. But Poilievre’s version of justice is not universal. It is conditional. It is situational. It is deeply, profoundly personal. The Broader Pattern: Institutions Are Sacred Until They Are Not: This is not the first time Poilievre’s principles have proven to be more flexible than advertised. He has attacked the Supreme Court of Canada when its rulings do not align with his political needs. He has accused the justice system of being too lenient when it suits him and too harsh when it does not. He has framed himself as the defender of institutions while undermining them whenever they become inconvenient. It is a pattern. It is a habit. It is a worldview. And it reveals something essential about his politics. For Poilievre, institutions are not pillars of democracy. They are tools. They are props. They are instruments to be used when helpful and discarded when not. The Satirical Truth: A Philosophy in One Sentence: Pierre Poilievre’s immigration philosophy can now be summarized with clinical precision: Canada must crack down on irregular border crossings, except for the ones that are fine. And he will decide which ones are fine. It is a stance that bends so far backward it could qualify for a gymnastics medal. It is a stance that reveals more about political convenience than national security. It is a stance that exposes the gap between what Poilievre says and what Poilievre does. And it is a stance that makes one thing abundantly clear. Polievre's Hypocrisy

When are they gonna crack down on the daily shooting/stabbings?

Crack down on immigration Consultants operating in India and other foreign countries who are agents of Immigration layers in Canada ...the Whole System is Corrupt thaw we Canadians do not get jobs and housing has become unaffordable..Thanks to The Treadue Government

We all know it’s happening. It’s time to crack down. While I like Vassy I don’t know she’s pushing back so hard. It is common sense. If you abuse the system you need to be kicked out of the country and we aren’t wasting our $ on you.

The cyclist dude cracked me up. Spitting truth

well done. we need to crack down on the abuse and send those that are illegally here back. more needs to be done

Cherry picking ragebait title. Carney has done a fantastic job. Cracking down on diploma mills != Legal immigrants.